The promise
of technology is that our lives can be simplified to better utilize time,
money, our environment, etc., yet some people say many technologies do quite
the opposite. These critics argue that
some technologies create a paradox, in that people believe they are freeing up
our lives, but really the technologies are tying us down. In thoughtful paragraphs, reflect and respond
to the following:
Step One: List
technologies you use every day, both simple and complex (refer to discussion
notes on simple vs. complex technology.)
After your brainstorm, list these technologies in terms of how crucial
they are to your life.
Step Two:
Reflect on your list above. What
would an outsider say about your list?
The critics? Do any of these
technologies create a paradox? Which
ones separate us from the natural world?
Which ones bring us closer to the natural world? How do these technologies impact your view of
other people? Of rationality?
Step Three:
Connect your views on technology with those themes you perceive so far
in the novel. Which technologies (both
yours and in the novel) bring us closer to individualism? Which ones bring us closer to
universalism? How do they help us cope
with the fear of death?
Which technologies transfer our decision-making to technological systems?
Which technologies transfer our decision-making to technological systems?
Step Four:
Agree or disagree, with explanation, with one of the below quotes:
“As technology enhances human capacities, it simultaneously erodes
other capacities and experiences: it intervenes between our senses and the
world, mystifies formerly mundane tasks, and creates new forms of human
dependence and ignorance” (Melley, 78).
“As technological rationality extends life, it inadvertently
spawns anxiety about machines, uncertainty about the real, a resurgence of
irrationality, and a heightened fear of mortality” (Melley, 81).
Melly,
Timothy. "Technology, Rationality, Modernity: An Approach to White
Noise." Engles, Tim, and John N. Duvall, Ed. Approaches to Teaching
Delillo's White Noise. New York: Modern Language Association of America,
2006. 73-83. Print.